Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

14900CL9-4GBXL | Crosshair Formula V | Phenom II

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 14900CL9-4GBXL | Crosshair Formula V | Phenom II

    Hello all I have not overclocked anything for years so I am a bit out of touch with this sort of thing but I have been having some performance trouble with my ram. What I am aiming for is a stable clock that will provide me with the best performance.

    I am having a lot of ram related lag and I was hoping I could get some help to remedy the situation. I have 2x4gb ripsaws 1866 currently running at 1600mhz. I am not sure what to set the manual settings at beyond 9-10-9-28

    All of my cooling is stock at the moment and I don't want anything that is going to run hot, just something stable that will utilize my ram better.

    Here are the options listed in my bios:
    CAS Latency:
    RAS to CAS Delay:
    RAS PRE Time:
    RAS ACT Time:
    Read to PRE Time:
    RAS to RAS Delay:
    Write to Read Delay:
    CAS Write Latency:
    Write Recovery Time:
    REF Cycle Time:
    Row Cycle Time:
    Read to Write Delay:
    Write to Read Delay(DD):
    Write to Write Timing:
    Read to Read Timing:
    Refresh Rate:
    Command Rate:

    Thank you for those who took the time to read this and even more-so those that took the time to reply.
    I will post my results in order to help with others that end up with this combo in the future.

  • #2
    What model CPU and mobo? There's a sticky for setting up 1600 sticks here:

    http://www.gskill.us/forum/showthread.php?t=7688

    though for your 1866 sticks...at 1600 will prob want the timings at 8-8-8-24 2N, and that will depend on if your CPU can run at 1600


    Pls offer comments on support I provide, HERE, in order to help me do a better job here:

    Tman

    Comment


    • #3
      Mobo: Crosshair V Formula http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16813131735
      AMD Phenom II x4 955 http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16819103808

      So do you mean I only need to change the timings to 8-8-8-24 and 2N and leave everything else on auto? Also would you mind specifying? I am unfamiliar with the abbreviation 2N.

      CAS Latency:8
      RAS to CAS Delay:8
      RAS PRE Time:8
      RAS ACT Time:24
      Read to PRE Time:auto
      RAS to RAS Delay:auto
      Write to Read Delay:auto
      CAS Write Latency:auto
      Write Recovery Time:auto
      REF Cycle Time:auto
      Row Cycle Time:auto
      Read to Write Delay:auto
      Write to Read Delay(DD):auto
      Write to Write Timing:auto
      Read to Read Timing:auto
      Refresh Rate:auto
      Command Rate:2N?

      Is this correct?
      Last edited by ajilejay; 10-09-2011, 05:23 PM.

      Comment


      • #4
        From here, it'll depend on if you can get the 955 to run 1600 in a stable state, normally would want a min of a 965 rev C for 1600


        Pls offer comments on support I provide, HERE, in order to help me do a better job here:

        Tman

        Comment


        • #5
          So if it locks up then take it down to 1333 with the same timing??

          *Edit*: Crashed @1666 so I set it @1333 at 8-8-8-24 1N is that correct?
          Last edited by ajilejay; 10-09-2011, 05:57 PM.

          Comment


          • #6
            See how it goes at 1333/CL8 if stable then you're good...however since you bought the 1866 sticks will prob want the best performance you can get, so could try 1333 at 7-7-7-21 for a boost


            Pls offer comments on support I provide, HERE, in order to help me do a better job here:

            Tman

            Comment


            • #7
              OK testing it @7/21

              Comment


              • #8
                May check back later tonight if I find wireless somewhere twixt here and Phoenix, otherwise will be back in the AM


                Pls offer comments on support I provide, HERE, in order to help me do a better job here:

                Tman

                Comment


                • #9
                  Seems to be stable

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Glad to hear it, Enjoy!


                    Pls offer comments on support I provide, HERE, in order to help me do a better job here:

                    Tman

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Yeah thanks for the help, just curious will I be able to run @ 1866 when AMD's bulldozer is released?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Yes, no problem at all.

                        Thank you
                        GSKILL TECH

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X